What is an Example of an “Unsupported Decision” After a Massachusetts DCF Investigation?
- When the child abuse or neglect allegations were false
Case Details:
- Allegation: Child accidentally swallowed grandmother’s pills.
- Investigation Finding: Pills were allergy medication, not harmful. Grandmother stored them in a locked cabinet.
- Child’s Actions: Climbed onto the counter, broke the lock, and took the pills (Easter, excessive candy, hyperactivity).
- DCF Decision: Unsupported child neglect allegations.
- Reasoning: Grandmother took precautions, kept medication out of reach. No need for DCF intervention.
- Outcome: Case closed, DCF ceased involvement with the family.
- False Allegation: Allegation proved false after thorough investigation.
- No Need for DCF Intervention: Grandmother’s actions deemed appropriate; DCF concluded no ongoing risk.
- Closure: DCF closed the case, illustrating instances where intervention is not warranted.
DISCLAIMER
You find yourself in this situation, it’s advisable to seek legal representation from a qualified attorney, like those at the Law Office of Kevin Seaver, who can advocate for your rights and guide you through the complex process of a DCF investigation.
Remember that the ultimate goal of DCF is to ensure the safety and well-being of children while supporting families in crisis.
Please note that this article does not create an Attorney-Client relationship between our law firm and the reader and is provided for informational purposes only. Information in this article does not apply to all readers.
Readers should not rely on this information as legal advice and should seek specific counsel from the attorney based on personal circumstances.
Thank you. Kevin Patrick Seaver is a Massachusetts DCF Defense Lawyer who represents parents against false child abuse allegations.
Massachusetts DCF Defense Lawyer Kevin Seaver has been successfully fighting false child abuse allegations since 1991.